After reading a little about all four types of systems I
knew immediately that I wanted to do classical. I do think it is the simplest
out of the four, but I feel that with the topic my group and I have, I think it
would work the best. Most people don’t know a lot about the issues in pharmacy
so I feel that to put it in a simple way with the basic facts will inform, but
not overwhelm the audience. I think we should open with facts and statistics to
at least get the audience interested since prescription drugs is a topic your
either interested in or your not. I think this will surprise the audience enough to make them
want to listen and here what we say. After that I think our stance on the issue
should be made and why we feel that way. Since all four of our stakeholders
were different I think we could all express our own opinions and then those of
our stakeholders if they support what we think as well. The opinion of a
doctor, pharmacist government official and an addict themselves will correlate
with each other. After that I think the current laws and regulations should be
talked about so then it is obvious what needs to be changed. Once the audience has been informed of
our stance, and the ways to change the current rules and regulations my group
would wrap up in a clever and powerful way. Give them the cause and effect if
nothing changes and then the benefits if things do change. After that I think
we should end with a question to continue to make the audience think even after
we are done presenting.
In
the past projects, I’ve always been the one stuck doing all the work at the
last minute. Or people always canceling when scheduled to work together. I
really hope with this new group the work can be spread out evenly. I also hope
that my group can meet a couple of times so that we are all confident. I want
to have this done in advance so that nothing is last minute.
No comments:
Post a Comment